Do contact lenses contain indications of PFAS “forever chemicals?” This was the question posed to us by members of Mamavation on Facebook. We didn’t know the answer to this, so we sent 18 different soft contact lenses off to an EPA-certified lab to have them tested for indications of PFAS. You’ve trusted Mamavation to bring you other consumer studies like indications of PFAS in dental floss, yoga pants, and sanitary pads, now join us for a consumer study on indications of PFAS “forever chemicals” inside eye contact lenses.
What our lab found was a bit concerning because 100% of the popular contact lens products we sent came back with various levels of organic fluorine, a marker for PFAS. So which contact lenses do we recommend? Based on the levels reported from our lab, we are sharing this data with you in hopes you will share it with your eye care professional. This information can help you and your eye care doctor make educated decisions about your eye care.
Disclosure: This consumer study is released in partnership with Environmental Health News. Scientific reviews were performed by (1) Terrence Collins, Teresa Heinz Professor of Green Chemistry & Director of the Institute for Green Sciences at Carnegie Mellon University, (2) Linda S. Birnbaum, Scientist Emeritus and Former Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program & Scholar at Residence at Duke University, North Carolina University, & Yale University, (3) Pete Myers, Chief Scientist at Environmental Health Sciences, Adjunct Professor of Chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University, and Co-Author of Our Stolen Future, & (4) Scott Belcher, Associate Professor with the Center for Environmental & Health Effects of PFAS at North Carolina State University. This post was medically reviewed by Sondra Strand, RN, BSN, PHN. Donations were provided by Environmental Health News and Mamavation community members. Mamavation has only “spot-checked” the industry and thus we cannot make predictions about brands and products that we have not tested. Products and manufacturing aides can change without notice so buyer beware. This post contains affiliate links, with some to Amazon, which means Mamavation will receive a portion of those sales and we will use that to pay ourselves back for the testing. You can also give a tax-deductible donation to our consumer studies here through Environmental Health Sciences. Click “yes” when asked if the gift is in honor of someone and type “Mamavation.” Thank you!
Table of Contents
Mamavation’s Lab Finds Indications of PFAS “Forever Chemicals” Inside 100% of Eye Contacts Tested
Contact lenses are medical devices that correct refractive vision errors like as nearsightedness (myopia) or farsightedness (hyperopia). Community members asked us whether there were any indications of PFAS “forever chemicals” inside contact lenses, so we sent the most popular pairs off to our EPA-certified lab to find out.
PFAS “forever chemicals” are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances used for many decades as stain-resistant, oil-resistant, & water-resistant chemicals in commerce. These chemicals reside in many places in our lives and are linked to serious health effects. PFAS chemicals were used for decades inside consumer products, as manufacturing aides, and inside building materials. Because they are so toxic, Mamavation has commissioned our own consumer studies on indications of PFAS in order to make consumer recommendations for which eye contacts are the least problematic.
For this consumer study, Mamavation sent 18 different types of soft eye contact lenses from three major brands off to an EPA-certified laboratory and discovered 100% of those products had indications of toxic PFAS “forever chemicals.”
Here’s what our EPA-certified laboratory found:
- 100% of contact lenses sent to our EPA-certified laboratory had indications of toxic PFAS “forever chemicals.” 18 soft eye contact lens products were found to have detections of organic fluorine, a marker for PFAS.
- Ranges of organic fluorine reported by the lab were from 105 to 20,700 parts per million (ppm).
- The most popular brands of eye contacts — Acuvue, Alcon, & Coopervision — were all found to have indications of PFAS “forever chemicals” at different levels.
- 22% of contact lenses tested had over 18,000 parts per million (ppm) of organic fluorine. That’s 4 out of 18 products.
- 44% of contact lenses tested had over 4,000 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine. That’s 8 out of 18 products.
Linda S. Birnbaum, Scientist Emeritus and Former Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program & Scholar at Residence at Duke University, North Carolina University, & Yale University had this to say: “Your eyes are one of the most sensitive parts of your body. Therefore, it’s concerning to see the presence of organic fluorine, which is likely a type of PFAS, found in all soft contact lens products tested. What about the idea of doing no harm? Do we have proof these products are safe? A lack of safety studies does not qualify as ‘safety,’ which is what is happening here.”
Health Effects Linked to PFAS “Forever Chemicals”
PFAS “forever chemicals” are problematic to human health and the environment. They are considered ubiquitous, persistent, and toxic. Many of these chemicals can last for years or decades in our bodies. Therefore, it’s imperative to reduce the amount of PFAS you are exposed to from food, water, and personal care products such as eye contacts.
Below are listed health impacts from exposure to PFAS in general:
- Reduction in immunity
- Reduced vaccination response
- Increased risk of allergies & asthma in young children
- Affected growth, learning, and behavior of infants and older children
- Increase cholesterol levels
- Metabolic diseases like obesity & diabetes
- Cardiovascular disease
- Lowered a woman’s chance of getting pregnant
- Lowered male fertility
- Increased risk of kidney & testicular cancers
- Causes endocrine disruption
- Disrupted normal thyroid function
We may not be able to tell you if or how much PFAS will leach into the body from exposure to the eyeball, but we do know that PFAS exposure is possible based on some studies looking at dermal exposure in animals. It’s also very clear based on biomonitoring evidence from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) that PFAS are in essentially all Americans.
According to Pete Myers, chief scientist for Environmental Health Sciences, “The presumption that these organic fluorine levels measured in contact lenses are safe is laughable. Last summer the EPA issued health advisories in drinking for four common PFAS, ranging from 0.004 parts per trillion (ppt) to 2000 ppt. EPA considers exposure beneath these thresholds to be safe for drinking water. While comparing drinking levels in water to concentrations in contact lenses is like comparing apples to oranges, it’s worth noting that all of the contact lenses tested exceeded 100 ppm, which is equivalent to 100,000,000 ppt, or 50,000 times higher than the highest level deemed safe in drinking water by the EPA.”
Can Exposure to PFAS Through the Eyeball Be Problematic?
In order to get contact lenses, you need a contact lens prescription from an ophthalmologist or an optometrist, so this isn’t something you can purchase easily. An eye care professional will give you an eye exam that evaluates your eye health and the quality of your vision. After this is done, they may recommend eyeglasses or a type of contact lens. The types of contact lenses they recommend can be soft lenses, permeable lenses, decorative contact lenses, multifocal contacts, toric lenses, daily contacts, extended-wear contacts, etc. If you decide to go the route of having contact lenses, you’ll also get a contact lens exam to ensure you can wear them effectively. Then you must make sure you are practicing good hygiene in order to avoid eye infections such as washing your hands, taking them out before you sleep, and never reusing eye contact solution.
The eye is one of the most sensitive areas of the human body, so it’s concerning to think that contact lenses are one of the many exposures to PFAS that are found inside consumer products in the United States. Based on our laboratory findings, the type and brand of contact lenses you select with your eye care doctor may have an impact on your health.
According to researchers in China, people who had higher levels of PFAS in their blood were more likely to have ocular eye diseases. But what happens when you are exposed to high levels of PFAS from contact lenses? Does the PFAS break down within the eye? We are not sure and couldn’t find studies looking into this situation, but it’s common sense to operate the precautionary principle when selecting the right contact lens with your eye care professional. However, we did find plenty of instances of PFAS exposure in drinking water being linked to eye diseases.
Members of the military and their spouses who were exposed to PFAS on military bases had some of the following conditions according to plaintiff attorneys:
- Myopia: A vision defect when far objects appear blurred and objects that are nearer are seen more clearly. In this instance, the eyeball is too long or the refractive power of the lens is too strong. This is also referred to as nearsightedness.
- Hyperopia: Hyperopia occurs when people have difficulty seeing things close to them, but can see objects far away easier. This is also referred to as “farsightedness.” This occurs because the eyeball is too short or the refractive power inside the lens is weak.
- Astigmatism: This vision defect is apparent when you are looking at a pattern of lines and the lines running in one direction look sharp while those in other directions appear blurred. This eye defect happens when light rays do not meet at a certain focal point on the retina. This is caused by non-uniform curvature of the cornea.
- Presbyopia: Usually this vision defect happens with old age and it’s defined as the gradual loss of focus on nearby objects over time. However, this process can be sped up with exposure to certain chemicals like PFAS.
Can Throwing Away Toxic Contact Lenses Be Problematic to the Environment?
According to the Centers for Disease Control, over 45 million Americans wear contact lenses. As of 2018, 35% to 46% of all patients wear daily disposable contact lenses and 2/3rds of those contact wearers are female. Of those wearers, 90% are using soft and disposable contact lenses.
It’s estimated on an annual basis, 2.5 billion contact lenses weighing approximately 44,000 pounds are thrown out and enter wastewater treatment plants in the United States because 15-20% of contact wearers throw their contact lenses into the toilet or sink. This ends up creating somewhat of a nightmare for wastewater treatment plants because, for every two pounds of sludge, they find a contact lens. Contact lenses are also very hard to see because they are clear and small. Ultimately anywhere from 6 to 10 metric tons of plastic lenses end up in wastewater in the U.S. every year.
Terrence Collins, Teresa Heinz Professor of Green Chemistry & Director of the Institute for Green Sciences at Carnegie Mellon University added some insight.
“Fluoropolymers improve the technical performance of contact lenses at attractive price performances and customers are naturally attracted. But the other key performances for safe and sustainable chemical products, the health, environmental and fairness performances, are not given adequate attention by manufacturers, legislators, or regulators. If you use fluoropolymer-containing contact lenses, you are likely to become permanently contaminated. No one today can tell you that fluoropolymer exposures are safe, because no jurisdiction has been demanding the development and scrutiny of appropriate safety testing. Your body cannot process fluoropolymers to safe products to protect you and nature is just as helpless when you throw the lenses away. But we know enough about PFAS chemicals to guess and fear that fluoropolymers in human cells or in the environment are anything but a pretty safety picture. I advise that such contact lenses be rigorously avoided.”
How Does PFAS Get Into Contact Lenses?
According to the American Chemical Society, contact lenses are typically made with a combination of poly(methylmethacrylate), silicones, and fluoropolymers (which are usually PFAS) to create a softer material. These materials allow oxygen to pass through the lens to the eye.
Based on the levels of organic fluorine we found in contact lenses, between 105 to 20,700 parts per million (ppm), we can assume fluoropolymers are used in different ways and in different amounts based on the function of the contact lens. This means that contact lens companies are adding these chemicals because they provide a special function, such as enhancing oxygen permeability to an extent greater than water alone.
Reporting from our lab indicated that the brand Alcon had the highest level of organic fluorine found. These products with a higher detection ranged from 18,400 ppm to 20,700 ppm.
Researchers who have studied “safety” claims on fluoropolymers and their use have concluded, “Given fluoropolymers’ extreme persistence; emissions associated with their production, use, and disposal; and a high likelihood for human exposure to PFAS, their production and uses should be curtailed except in cases of essential uses.” Are contact lenses an “essential use?” More to the point, are the uses of fluoropolymers in contact lenses essential to the proper functioning of the lenses? It would be very helpful if contact lens designers were to provide information about how the addition of fluoropolymers to contact lenses enhances their performance. Are they essential? Are there replacement chemistries? This should become a high-priority discussion among optometrists. Ask yours.
Other Categories of Products We’ve Tested for Indications of PFAS “Forever Chemicals”
Before we launch into the raw data from our lab, we wanted to remind you about all the other studies we have done on indications of PFAS “forever chemicals” inside the food and consumer products you bring inside your home.
-
- Soft Contact Lenses
- Green Beauty Makeup
- Dental Floss
- Toilet Paper
- Period Underwear
- Tampons
- Sanitary Pads, Pantiliners, & Incontinence Pads
- Powdered Electrolytes
- Butter Wrappers
- Pasta & Tomato Sauces
- Nut Butters (Peanut butter, etc.)
- Cooking Oils (olive oil, almond oil, canola oil, etc)
- Ketchup
- Activewear (Yoga Pants)
- Sports Bras
- Parchment Paper
- Cupcake Liners
- Plastic-Free Straws
- Fast Food Packaging
- Children’s Probiotics
- Kids’ Backpacks
- Baby Strollers
Mamavation’s Raw Data on Indications of PFAS “Forever Chemicals” in Contact Lenses
To recap, Mamavation sent 18 soft contact lenses from 3 major brands to an EPA-certified laboratory looking for indications of PFAS “forever chemicals.” In order for our lab to do this, they have to perform special testing. They do not look for PFAS compounds directly, because that’s simply impossible. There are over 12,000 PFAS compounds and assays available for less than 100 compounds exist in a really good commercial lab.
Testing: Mamavation’s lab uses marker testing to identify the potential presence of PFAS “forever chemicals” in contact lenses. Organic fluorine is a marker for PFAS because all PFAS chemicals are carbon-based compounds that contain fluorine. The specific lab method used by Mamavation tested for total fluorine was the Determination of Total Fluorine by Oxygen Flask Combustion and Ion-Selective Electrode. If total fluorine was observed at a detection level of 10 ppm, the lab did the Determination of free Fluoride Ion in the product by Ion-Selective Electrode and then subtracted that from the Total Fluorine to determine the amount of organic fluorine. This type of marker screening test is likely to show the presence of PFAS. Along with PFAS, other organic fluorine can also capture other fluorochemicals, non-PFAS fluorine-containing pharmaceuticals, and pesticides. None of which you want around your eyes!
Scott Belcher, Ph.D. & Associate Professor with the Center for Environmental & Health Effects of PFAS at North Carolina State University says “fluoropolymers are extremely common forms of PFAS that are contributing to the organic fluorine found in contact lenses. Methods used for detecting individual PFAS, such as PFOA or GenX, cannot directly identify fluoropolymers. However, the analysis of total organic fluorine does account for all PFAS contaminants in contact lenses, including the copolymers approved for use in contact lenses. Therefore, this method of testing serves as a good ‘spot-check’ for fluoropolymers and a screen for PFAS in consumer products.”
What We Tested: We tested close to every brand that was recommended by the Mamavation community, which were also considered some of the most popular products. In total, we tested 18 contact lenses. These contact lenses were donated to us by someone working inside an ophthalmologist’s office in the fall of 2022. The packages were not opened and sent directly to the lab to be analyzed.
Not Our Favorite Eye Contact Lenses
These products were sent to an EPA-certified lab and found to have 1,000 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine or more.
- Acuvue Oasys with HydraLuxe 1-Day — 6,096 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Acuvue Vita Astigmatism Senofilcon C Brand Contact Lenses — 5,537 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Air OPTIX (No Hydraglide) Soft Contact Lenses for Astigmatism — 20,000 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon AIR OPTIX Colors Contact Lenses with Smartshield Technology — 20,700 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Dailies Colors One-Day Contact Lenses — 18,400 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Total 30 Contact Lenses for Daily Wear — 20,400 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Coopervision Biofinity Toric Contact Lenses — 4,751 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Coopervision Comfilcon A Multifocal Tinted Soft Contact Lenses — 5,613 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
Better Eye Contact Lenses
These contacts were sent to an EPA-certified lab and found to have between 200 parts per million (ppm) and 1000 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine.
- Alcon Dailies TOTAL 1 One-Day Contact Lenses Water Gradient — 625 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon MULTIFOCAL Dailies AquaComfort Plus One-Day Contact Lenses — 346 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Precision 1 One-Day Contact Lenses with SmartSurface Technology — 302 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon TORIC Dailies AquaComfort Plus One-Day Contact Lenses — 914 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
Best Eye Contact Lenses
These contacts were sent to an EPA-certified lab and found to have less than 200 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine. Unfortunately, there were no products that were non-detect.
- Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus Brand Contact Lenses with UV Blocking — 113 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus for Astigmatism — 105 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon AIR OPTIX plus HydraGlyde with Smartshield Technology — 119 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Dailies MULTIFOCAL TOTAL 1 One-Day Contact Lenses Water Gradient — 183 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alcon Dailies TOTAL 1 One-Day Contact Lenses Water Gradient for Astigmatism — 106 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
- Alon Air OPTIX plus HydraGlyde for Astigmatism — 173 parts per million (ppm) organic fluorine
Additional Mamavation Investigations To Help Your Family
Mamavation works hard to bring our readers relevant public health information to assist in choosing more non-toxic products. Over the years, we have ranked tens of thousands of consumer products and food that are brought into the home. Here are some of the investigations that we thought you may also be interested in:
- Best Yoga mats
- Best Infrared Saunas
- Best Organic Mattresses
- Best Air purifiers
- Best Cookware
- Best Plant-Based Milks
- Best Water Filters for PFAS Filtration
- Best Collagen
- Best Electrolyte Replacement Drinks, Sports Drinks, & Coconut Water
- Best Infrared Saunas
- Best Bubble Bath
Click here for a complete list of product investigations.
Loisud
Thanks for sharing!
https://driftboss.io
Posida
I appreciate you trying the contacts. Would you include testing with Biofinity contact lenses?
drift boss
Posida Mina
This is really a nice and informative drift boss, containing all the information and also has a big impact on the new technology.
Trudy
For those wanting a certain brand/contact tested. Donate your lenses so, they may be tested. I also suggest donating to the cause. This testing isn’t free but everyone is expecting results. Donations are what will keep them thriving.
Andre
Eiyan Lens claims their lens are PFAs free
Rebecca
I am just now seeing this thread. I am curious if now, a year later, you have any more information on B & L. A new contact handed to me is the Infuse lens. I would love to hear your thoughts, even if it means you need donations of the lenses. Thank you!
lori
same I’d like to know as well about the infuse lens
Adam
Did people see this? https://www.ehn.org/contact-lenses-pfas-2667272067.html
A report in Chemosphere journal concluding that those who use contact lenses have higher levels of exposure to PFAS – a group of hazardous chemicals – compared to those who don’t: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653524000274
Sarah
Bausch & Lamb recently made a claim that their contacts are all free from PFAS. Could you test these next?
kerry friedman
I use Comfilcon A toric – can you please test these?
Cat
is there an update to this list? thx for the great info!
Laurel Henley
Yes, would love to know if an updated list is coming out soon with Eiyan and Bausch and Lomb lenses included. Do you still need donations? Happy to help in anyway I can.
Niki Cassar
I’ve been wearing daily contact lenses since the very first day they went on sale in the UK – from memory, that was around late 1980’s? I’ve always worn Acuvue, and for the past few year, I’ve worn Acuvue Moist. I’ve recently been diagnosed with early stage cataracts, and I’m concerned that the PFAs may well be a strong contributory factor, which is shocking as I am someone who shuns all forms of pharmaceutical medication, eats mainly organic food and uses organic/eco-friendly beauty and cleaning products.
I am very anxious to hear the test results on Acuvue Moist!!
Joy
As a previous comment said J&J states in their website’s FAQ that they don’t use any PFAS. Sounds like could be right for a class action.
Niki Cassar
I’m in the UK. I emailed J&J and asked them for information on PFAs in their soft lenses range. They replied quite quickly saying:
Johnson & Johnson Vision does not use PFAS in our soft contact lenses.
Where does this leave us?!
I also emailed Eiyan and their reply was the following:
We currently only carry monthly PFAs free contacts.
However, we are currently expanding and they should be available on our site within the next few months.
Esther
The recent cataracts and macular degeneration epidemics are the result of LED lights. Try to change back to incandescent or halogen if you can at home, but definitely avoid looking at LED street lights or headlights–the damage is almost immediate and permanent.
Gurdle
Is anyone else wondering why the acuvue oasys one day lenses hydroluxe and the acuvue oasys hydraclear pfa levels are very very different. They both have similar components, almost identical. I’m not sure what to do because one is ranked as the worst and the other is ranked as the best lens.
Chris
If anyone figures out how to get your blood level PFAS tested, please let us know!
thanks
Chris
Linda Frasco
Hi Chris. I live in Florida and just read that Quest Blood testing labs do have a new test to test for PFAS blood levels. Check it out in your state to see if they can perform the test at your local lab.
suzzette Logan
WOW! I just happened to be in an eye surgeon’s office when I received this email. I have worn soft lenses for 50 years as I played high school and collegiate sports and wearing my very thick glasses would have made it nearly impossible to play. I thought I had not used Teflon products for over 40 years to protect my health. Now I have several irreversible eye conditions. When I discussed this article with the surgeon she said she was aware of the PFAS, “but what can you do”? Do!!! I was flaming mad as I have worked with Naturopathic physicians for years to detoxify my liver and body. I would DEFINTALY be interested in a class action law suit! My sight is at stake!
Chris
Thank you for all the great work you are doing regarding PFAS!
I am very concerned about the PFAS in contact lenses since I have been wearing them for about 40 years! I do have eye problems such as floaters and flashes and blepharitis among other things.
Since I read your report I stopped wearing the lenses and use my glasses, but it is difficult since one eye is -1.50 and the other is -7.50!
I would be happy to send you 4 contacts that I use to test that are not on the current list and would be extremely interested to know the results.
They are Coopervision Proclear 1 day disposable lenses. I also just ordered the Eiyan and I could possibly send some of those.
Please let me know! I did send a message to the e-mail address you mentioned
Anonymous
This “study” seems super sketchy and aimed at directing consumers towards a lens purported to have no PFAS. However, the new lens (Eiyan, made in China) was NOT included in this study. And the lenses were “donated” (possibly stolen?) by an employee of an ophthalmologist. What did this person do with these contacts before they were donated? They should obtain contacts directly from the manufacturer for believable results.
Sophie Herbert Slater
Would you be able to test Eiyan contacts to see if their claim of being PFAs-free is true? I’ve worn contact lenses (fortunately the “best” ones on your list for 22 years). I’ll switch in a heartbeat if the claims are true!
L
This study was very informative and upsetting, but it leaves us with a lot of questions. Does the fluorine stay in the contact, and not get absorbed by the body. If it is absorbed, then how much. Compared to what is allowed in drinking water the number seems exorbitant, so does it really make a difference which catagory our contacts fall in, no matter which ones you tested the numbers were unbelievably high. I think this is why it is important to understand what the numbers actually mean and how it translates to effectd health. Also interesting is how is it that the companies are saying there is not fluorine yet there is clearly fluorine in the contacts. Also this is the actual contact, is there any information on the solution that the contacts are floating in.
Joakim
How accurate are the results? Do you think that the same contacts but from different batches can have widely different levels of PFAS?
M
Hey there!
I got a important question regarding the best on the list lenses. Maybe I’m not the only one wondering about this… So, the Alcon AIR OPTIX are monthly’s, while the other two Alcon’s are dailies.
Would it generally be better to opt for one pair of these monthlies with low PFAS levels over the dailies, where you might accumulate much more PFAS because you go through 30 of them? I.e. does the length of use have any effect on potential exposure?
My first instinct was using just one pair must be better, but maybe them being exposed to cleaning solution every day makes it somehow worse and a fresh pair every day worn for just a couple of hours might be less problematic.
I guess this is something that can only be determined through some sort of testing. Would be happy to hear someone else’s thoughts on this!
pat carnaroli
Where is the complete list of contacts tested and results? Can you post this?
Leah Segedie
It’s right there at the bottom of the post. If you are having trouble finding it, use the clickable table of contents.
Anonymous
Acuvue websit states : No PFAs are used in acuvue contacts.
https://www.acuvue.com/questions
So are they lying in writing?
Anonymous
thats what i am wondering as well
Anonymous
Came across this article that also found pfas in Acuvue
https://www.prevention.com/health/a43919982/contact-lenses-contain-dangerous-amounts-of-forever-chemicals-pfas/
Maybe they are lying or maybe they don’t purposefully use pfas but these labs are finding cross contamination?
AlessandroTTR
Are the lenses tested for the USA market only?
Or can we expect the same issues for european products?
Leah Segedie
I’m not sure. 🤷♀️
Sarah
Would love to see some follow up testing.
Eiyan Lens company (eiyanlens.com) is claiming their contact lenses have no PFAs. I contacted them and they just repeated that statement. They did not provide any testing results or certifications to back up their marketing claim. I would LOVE to see their lenses get tested. Please do some more testing. Consumers are definitely interested!
Thank you.
Leah Segedie
We can test donations of contact lenses and add as an update later if you can get your hands on them. Need a minimum of 4 contacts. Email me at leah at bookieboo dot com if you are interested and need instructions and a mailing address.
M
Please do this! I also found Eiyan while looking for alternatives and messaged them if their lenses are totally free of any PFCs but haven’t heard back.
M
Billie King
Hi I have two brand new pair of eilyan contacts . I am having vision problems with them. I can mail them in to you.
Sera
This is about rigid contacts, maybe soft contacts also have contact with fluorine? ,,Initially, increased oxygen permeability was achieved by adding more silicone to the lens materials. However, this ultimately caused GP lenses to become more fragile and caused them to dry out and accumulate lens deposits more easily.
Eventually, fluorine was added to GP lens polymers to solve these problems. Today’s fluoro-silicone/acrylate GP lenses are optimized for oxygen permeability, lens stability and surface wetting characteristics.”
https://www.allaboutvision.com/contacts/faq/contact-materials.htm
Maurice
The studies were done with soft lenses, not hard.
Tracy
Have gas permeable contact lenses been tested?
Anonymous
Please test Bausch & Lomb Ultra
Anonymous
Are there any safe alternatives to soft lenses? Have hard lenses been tested?
Anonymous
Who would like to start the class-action lawsuit?
Anonymous
Please test Acuvue MOIST
Anonymous
Yes! I wear these as well! Thank you!
Anonymous
I wear them as well and would like to know.
Steve
I sent off my Acuvue moist to her. Look for results around August 1.
Leah Segedie
That’s the date you can reach out to me and I’ll likely have the results…not the date that I’ll be publishing because we need LOTS more product to report on. I’ve only received about 2 donations thus far. That’s not enough.
crystal
can I get a copy of the results? for personal use, looking into purchasing them but am now conflicted
Jane
Thank you. Acuvue says no fluorine or PFAS in any of their lenses. No evidence provided. Yeesh.
Christine
Did you test Acuvue vita contact lenses?
Tessa
Why did you leave out Bausch & Lomb products from your testing? Were you sponsored by them to do the study?
Leah Segedie
Well that sounds kina accusatory. But the answer is no. Most of the money came from the Mamavation community and my own pocketbook for this one. Donations were from community members as well.
Victor Curro
Just wanted to update some folks here that wear B+L . They said they don’t use PFAS chemicals in the manufacture of their lenses. They wouldn’t send an email though… so I don’t have it in writing.
Marion
So did Alcon, but look at the study..
Chinmay Deshpande
Hello, My son was precribed Coopervision MiSight® 1 day. Is there any test data on these. They contact lenses are for kids 8 yrs and up. We need to know if kids are being exposed to these harmful chemicals.
Leah Segedie
If you want to donate that one, I can test it for you. I’ll need 4 contacts to do the testing. Email me at leah at bookieboo dot com.
Victor Curro
Please test Bausch and Lomb and thanks for doing this!
Leah Segedie
Would love to test those, but I need them to be donated cause I don’t have access to them. Can you donate 4 pairs? If so, email me at leah at bookieboo dot com.
Trudy
For those wanting a certain brand/contact tested. Donate your lenses so, they may be tested. I also suggest donating to the cause. This testing isn’t free but everyone is expecting results. Donations are what will keep them thriving.
james
how about bausch&lomb contact lens ?
Anonymous
This research needs to be put into the eyeballs of Congress! Make them see it!
Anonymous
Are hard contact lenses a safer option? Has any testing been done on hard lenses? Thank you!
Leah Segedie
No we haven’t had any hard contact donations so we haven’t had a chance to test them yet. If you want to donate, get a hold of me leah at bookieboo dot com.
mylonestar d2l
I’m happy by reading your enjoyable article, Keep uploading more interesting articles like this.
Torrey Lawyer
I was wondering if you have tested or can please test contact solution! I have no idea what brand is safe to buy at this point!! Thank you for your research!
Anonymous
I agree! Please do test contact solution! We may use the best contact lenses on the list but it would be useless if contact solution is laden with the same forever chemicals.
Leah Segedie
Testing the solution….that may not be possible. Liquids are harder for my lab. But I can try. Would be great if I could get some donations of product for that. Need something brand new and never opened…
Annonymous
Wow disappointing to note that no one brand-manufacturer seemed to do better than others, so we must rely on testing of individual lenses. Thank you!
Leah Segedie
Well the differences in levels I thought were VAST. So there’s that. You CAN find ones that are lower than others.
Anonymous
Thank you for this excellent research and for sharing it.
MA Hinshaw
Thank you for this excellent research and for sharing it.
A.T.
Can you please elaborate on Teresa Heinz’s statement: “If you use fluoropolymer-containing contact lenses, you are likely to become permanently contaminated.” I have unknowingly been wearing some of the worst contacts on your list. So am I permanently contaminated? What will this mean for my body and my health? I assume permanently contaminated means there is no way to mitigate or remedy this exposure. I tried to contact my eye doctor today. She left me a message to talk to the “technicians” in her office if I need help. I specifically referenced PFAS in my request to speak to her. I am getting the feeling she doesn’t want to be bothered with this discussion. Thanks.
zoe
Fluoropolymers don’t break down and they are all around us. We drink them, eat them, etc. Basically what I’m saying is we all have pfas in us sadly. So don’t worry as much. We need to confront these manufacturers.
A.T.
Thank you for your kind reply. I am considering getting a PFAS blood test to check my levels since I have been a contact lens wearer for decades.
Anonymous
did u get the results on your test? curious to see.
Leah Segedie
It wasn’t Teresa Heinz…it was Terrence Collins who made that statement. He’s head of that department. He saying this because PFAS is persistent and doesn’t go away and depending on what type may take decades to be detoxed out of your body. This is why they call them “forever chemicals.”
Jenny M
Thank you for doing this testing!
I would love to know the results of regular Biofinity, BioTrue dailies, and Acuvue Moist dailies.
Our family uses these and I’ve always had a thought at the back of my mind that it may have negative health effects to have these in contact with our mucous membranes 14-16 hours a day.
Acia
+1 for testing these brands and dailies
Leah Segedie
I can accept donations of that type. Can you donate 4 brand new pairs? Email me at leah at bookieboo dot com.
Worried
Hello,
Any chance you could test for CooperVision Proclear daily disposable contact lenses?
Thank you.
Jenny
Thank you for testing contacts. Would you add Biofinity contact lenses to your testing?
Jessi
Should also test hidrocor brand contacts. I’ve noticed the yearlies make my eyes burn pretty bad after a few hours. You can find them on Lens.me without a prescription
Anonymous
Will you be testing Bausch & lomb ultra, and acuvue moist 1-day?
Schuyler R Denham
Please do.
Anonymous
Yes, please test those.
Anonymous
I would like ^ Bausch & Lomb to be tested too!
Connie
Yes! Please report your findings for Bausch and Lomb!!
$Jj
Yes! Why weren’t they included in the study?
james
I’m curious too
Steve
I sent off my Acuvue moist to her. Look for results around August 1.
Alex
Any results on the acuvue moist contact lenses yet? Thank you!
kiki
Has there been any updates to this thx so much!